Sunday, February 28, 2010

Fwd: Hi Apoorva - Genral enquiry.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ramesh Malhotra <ramesh.malhotra26@yahoo.com>
Date: 28 February 2010 02:43
Subject: Re: Hi Apoorva - Genral enquiry.
To: "Apoorva Joshi (A.J.)" <apoorvanature@gmail.com>


Hi Apoorva,
 
I forgot to mention one thing. :-
 
I bow down with immense shame in front of you. Today in my life i fooled myself. I cant even catch a rat or never ever seen a crocodile or tiger.
 
If you could forgive me for myact i will be thankful to you. I 'm very much deeply regretting of doing such an inane thing in my life.
 
Kindly please FORGIVE me. I won't go anything as such to anyone in my life.
 
I'm a very simple guy, 24yr old from a middle class family. don't know anything and dont have any right to disturb you.
 
It must be hard for you to forgive me bt please understand me as being a human and i promise there won't be anything such i will do in my life.
 
I can't even think of wild life ..just seen animals in zoo.
 
kindly remove my email from your blog. more than that i can't do anything bt just promise of not doing such kind act in my complete life.
 
I again bend on my kness and apologize to you.
 
Please accept my apology  !
 
Please ! do this favour on me.


--- On Sat, 27/2/10, Apoorva Joshi (A.J.) <apoorvanature@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Apoorva Joshi (A.J.) <apoorvanature@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Hi Apoorva - Genral enquiry.
To: "Ramesh Malhotra" <ramesh.malhotra26@yahoo.com>
Date: Saturday, 27 February, 2010, 6:51 PM


Not killing them doesnt mean it is authorized to trade in them. I never mentioned you hunting the animals and then trading in them. I dont think of you as a poacher Ramesh. It is simply ILLEGAL to trade in wild animal skins in India. And as a citizen of the country, it's your job to abide by the law. Don't get me wrong. My tone was intended to be harsh because you framed your question in a very wrong manner. You should clarify things you say .. especially when they pertain to such sensitive issues. 

And you ought to understand that we're not aggressive for the heck of it. We're aggressive coz these times have forced us to become that way and the slightest error in your framing of sentences could make you look like the cruel-est of people. I know people who would be willing to catch hold of you and take u to task only coz they have seen your mail. But thankfully, I only thought of it as some sort of instigation. 

Never mind. Just understand that its illegal. If you want information on how u can CONSERVE wildlife, then you feel free to mail me whenever you like. But for such stuff, if you ask me, I can only get you into trouble with the authorities. 

Best,
Apoorva Joshi.

On 27 February 2010 18:15, Ramesh Malhotra <ramesh.malhotra26@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hello !
 
I'm sorry !
 
We never kill any animals/ reptiles for their skin neither into any kind of illegal activities. I'm sorry for bothering you ...let me say one thing. You are blogs are really very much informative and which gave me lead to contact you.
 
Best Wishes
 
Best Regards
Ramesh
 


--- On Sat, 27/2/10, Apoorva Joshi (A.J.) <apoorvanature@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Apoorva Joshi (A.J.) <apoorvanature@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Hi Apoorva - Genral enquiry.
To: "Ramesh Malhotra" <ramesh.malhotra26@yahoo.com>
Date: Saturday, 27 February, 2010, 8:25 AM


First of all, dont EVER send me a "General Enquiry" like that again. 

Secondly - if you're in the trading business, I suggest you trade clothes made of cotton instead of skins of wild animals. Also, trade grocery, rice, wheat, cotton, soft drinks, medical supplies, electronic items.. whatever the heck..

If you expect to come across a Tiger and Crocodile skin by emailing people who CONSERVE these animals, you're making the worst mistake of your life mate. I don't know what you are, where you are and who you are or else I'd have traded YOU to Tibet. 

And Mr.Ramesh Malhotra I AM doing well. I would also do well to tell you exactly just what happens to people who trade in Tiger skins and Crocodile skins. Look for yourself and you'll see how angry conservationists can get if you get on their wrong side. 

Don't ever ask any one that question again. And if you're so interested in fashion, wear clothes. Not animals. 

-Apoorva Joshi.

On 26 February 2010 21:39, Ramesh Malhotra <ramesh.malhotra26@yahoo.com> wrote:
Helllo !
 
I hope you are doing well !
 
I would just like to ask if there any place where i can find skin of crocodile or tiger  ..so tht can be used for fashion acceessories ? we are into trading business.
 
kindly let me know..
 
regards
Ramesh


The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage.



--
Only when something is wrong can we work to change it; improve it. Thing is, we actually have to DO the job, not simply wait for someone else to.
~Apoorva Joshi~ [www.wildwithme.blogspot.com]


The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage.



--
Only when something is wrong can we work to change it; improve it. Thing is, we actually have to DO the job, not simply wait for someone else to.
~Apoorva Joshi~ [www.wildwithme.blogspot.com]


Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.



--
Only when something is wrong can we work to change it; improve it. Thing is, we actually have to DO the job, not simply wait for someone else to.
~Apoorva Joshi~ [www.wildwithme.blogspot.com]

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Request for Tiger and Crocodile Skin

Mail Title :

Hi Apoorva - Genral enquiry

fromRamesh Malhotra ramesh.malhotra26@yahoo.com
toapoorvanature@gmail.com
date26 February 2010 21:39
subjectHi Apoorva - Genral enquiry.
mailed-byyahoo.com
Signed byyahoo.com
hide details 21:39 (16 hours ago)
Helllo !
I hope you are doing well !
I would just like to ask if there any place where i can find skin of crocodile or tiger ..so tht can be used for fashion acceessories ? we are into trading business.
kindly let me know..
regards
Ramesh

-------------------------------------------------------------
REPLY:
romApoorva Joshi (A.J.)
sender timeSent at 13:55 (GMT+05:30). Current time there: 13:56.
toRamesh Malhotra
date27 February 2010 13:55
subjectRe: Hi Apoorva - Genral enquiry.
mailed-bygmail.com
hide details 13:55 (0 minutes ago)
First of all, dont EVER send me a "General Enquiry" like that again.

Secondly - if you're in the trading business, I suggest you trade clothes made of cotton instead of skins of wild animals. Also, trade grocery, rice, wheat, cotton, soft drinks, medical supplies, electronic items.. whatever the heck..

If you expect to come across a Tiger and Crocodile skin by emailing people who CONSERVE these animals, you're making the worst mistake of your life mate. I don't know what you are, where you are and who you are or else I'd have traded YOU to Tibet.

And Mr.Ramesh Malhotra I AM doing well. I would also do well to tell you exactly just what happens to people who trade in Tiger skins and Crocodile skins. Look for yourself and you'll see how angry conservationists can get if you get on their wrong side.

Don't ever ask any one that question again. And if you're so interested in fashion, wear clothes. Not animals.

-Apoorva Joshi.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

My Name is Religion and I Am Your Worst Enemy


Yeah, I just saw My Name Is Khan and as usual, I don't care what people across the globe have been saying about it. Here's my opinion : Karan Johar deserves all the compliments possible for even making an EFFORT to shift base from hopeless sad family stories to something so real, so moving and so bloody introspective. An effort well made, in his case at least, paid off very well. Technically, I quite liked both Shah Rukh and Kajol in their respective roles though at time they did seem mechanical. This is not a movie review. This is a "ME Review". 3 hours of Khan and I walked out asking myself so many questions.
It's a movie about something that can happen to anyone. Any one. It's a film that EVERY living "Religious" person should watch. Everyone who has an opinion on other people. Every one who thinks highly of themselves but not of other people. In short, most humans.
For the Hindus that look at every passing Muslim with an eye of suspicion, an eye of disgust and a feeling of hatred - you are the reason the world is in this situation today. Because you spread this disgust. This "dharm-adharm" bullshit. This completely blood-red side of your faith. You give it to your children, who then pass it on, to their friends, neighbours, children and so on. You started a fire. A fire that kills. Not a fire that saves others from freezing to death. If you want to start a fire, I suggest you consider the latter.
For the Muslims who think every Hindu has bad intentions, misconceptions and a bitter heart - you are the reason people like me stop believing in people. I am a Hindu. And I don't care about it. I also, don't care about you being a Muslim. Coz' all I see you as, is human. A body with two pairs of limbs, 2 eyes, a mouth, a nose, and a voice. I see you as I see myself. And if some random person started looking at me like I was a walking talking suicide bomber, I would give a rat's ass. Ignorance IS bliss sometimes.
We use our voices, most often, for the worst things. Insult. Abuse. Curse. Do we ever raise them in support? Of ANOTHER Religion? Do we? Just like Hindus die in bomb blasts, so do Muslims. So do Christians. So do Parsis. Do we ever cry for them? Ever thought why? I did.
For those of you who don't believe in Religion, and accept people for who they are, irrespective of what consequences you might have to face as regards society, family, friends.. whatever - it would really help if you asked yourself WHY you don't believe in religion. Did you always "not believe" in it? Did you once believe but later lose faith in its existence or its actual motive? Did you stop believing in it because others your age are fast losing their faith in it and you don't want to look stupid? Or did you actually HAVE a reason of your own?
For those people who strongly believe in their respective Religion and who also believe that it is your Religion alone that is made up of the world's goodness, for those who believe that all other faiths are made of people who are hell bent on destroying the world - Get up. Look in your mirror. And ask yourself WHY you believe what you do. Just coz your father told you that if you don't you will be disowned from the family? Just because your grandfather threatened you to love honour and respect your religion like it was the Holy Truth? Or because every other corner of every other street in this country has a mandir or a masjid or a church and eventually, someday, you're going to have to get married in one of them so you might as well choose one now? Or because if you don't, you will never have any friends and you won't ever be able to get yourself an identity?
Is your Religion really your identity?? Or is it YOU who makes yourself who you are? Do you have the innumerable experiences you have in life because your are of a particular faith? Does your Religion make your decisions and choices for you? How can you forget so easily, the obvious truth that binds ALL of us? We're called Humanity. Because we are ONE race. We have different colours coz that's how we're meant to camouflage with our habitat. Don't you get fairer when you go to the Himalayas? Don't you get tanned when you lie on the beach in Goa? Does that change your race? Does it MATTER what colour or religion you are??
Dont people around you also feel pain? Dont people from families of other religion also die? Dont they have just as much talent as you do? Then WHY do you want this war to continue? If there is a bunch of misguided people in this world, why should we focus on their religion instead of them!? Islam does NOT teach destruction. If it did, the world wouldn't need to wait for Armagedon. We'd have ended LONG ago. When your son, daughter, grandmother, father, friend, uncle, aunt, cousin, get stuck in a bomb blast, it will be a Sheikh someone pulling them out from under the rubble and rushing them to the hospital in WHATEVER mode of transport available. When tragedy hits us, instead of uniting, the first thing we do, is divide the Hindus and Muslims in teams. And then we stand at the border line and point fingers.
I am against Pakistan. Im not against Pakistanis. Im against the government of the country. Because of obvious reasons. And if you don't understand what those reasons are, kindly email me coz' that's not what this article is about.
All I know is, I am absolutely not proud to be a human. To belong to a race that knows only destruction. And if someone tries to stop it, the sadistic politically oriented ones will go up in arms against that poor soul and single him out and slaughter him.. in the dark of the night and then say it was the other religion who did it. HOW is it religion's fault when we ourselves are so screwed up?! And then people say "...when you have your own children." WHY will I want to bring any child into THIS world? To see the way people of your own species treat each other? And how it is wrong to stand up for what's right? I would be nothing short of an indirect murderer. I sound negative. Horribly pessimistic maybe. But the truth is, I have just no faith left any more. I never believed in Religion. But today, I don't even believe in Humanity. I thought THAT was our main identity.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

A Celebration and A Launch

First up - 101st post, this! Had no idea Ive been writing for so long, and so much! Insha Allah, may the blog grow with each year :) That's the "celebration".
Now for the launch. Hadn't written about this at all. It's been almost 2 yrs since this was born. Then for a year, it fell. Flat on its face. Resurrected it only this year. Something Im very close to. Something I started, and something, that is today, becoming a self-sustained NGO. A dream, nurtured for very long, waiting for the right people to come along, waiting; silently in the wings, observing people, their work, their character.. And today, all that observing is coming in handy.
The organization that was once a youth group, is today, being registered as a Trust/NGO. :) And to be working for something I have LOVED all my life, is something no one can define in words.. it's a feeling of pure ecstatic satisfaction! And with that, comes another reason to celebrate..

All in all, 2010 promises to be MUCH better than I had expected after 2009! :)

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Supreme Court Denies 3 High-Profile Environmental Cases

Operation : King Cobra [literally]

http://news.oneindia.in/2010/02/23/wildlifeofficials-operate-on-11ft-king-cobra-inbhopal.html

Wildlife officials operate on 11ft King cobra in Bhopal

Tuesday, February 23, 2010,14:11 [IST]

Bhopal, Feb.23 (ANI): In a unique attempt, wildlife officials in Madhya Pradesh operated on a King Cobra, seized from a snake charmer, to resurrect its damaged fangs.

Officials of the Van Vihar national park in Bhopal operated on the 11-feet long cobra after they found that the reptile was not able to eat due to an infection in its mouth.

"It is the first time that we are operating on a King cobra and we never had a cobra. The treatment was essential as the veins connecting the poison glands were damaged. The snake has not eaten anything for many days," said A.K. Khare, Deputy Director, Van Vihar national park on Monday.

The cobra was administered anti-biotic medicines and was doing fine after the operation, officials said.

King cobra can be identified from other cobras by its size and the pattern on its neck. Its diet consists primarily of other snakes. The venom of the King Cobra is primarily neuro-toxic, and the snake is capable of killing a human with a single bite. By Ram Chand Sahu. (ANI)

Friday, February 19, 2010

Tiger News - census methods and more

http://news.oneindia.in/2010/02/18/superiortechniques-needed-for-accurate-tiger-census-saysf.html

Superior techniques needed for accurate tiger census, says forest official

Thursday, February 18, 2010,10:57 [IST]

Garo Hills (Meghalaya), Feb 18 (ANI): With unofficial estimates of the tiger population in India being as low as 1,100-1,200, forest officials in Meghalaya have called for the availability of advanced techniques for more accurate census-taking.
Forest Officer S. Kumar has said that the forest department has asked the Wildlife Institute of India to use advanced census-taking techniques to find the exact number of tigers in the state.


"They had written also from the Central Government side to the Wildlife Institute of India; (they) were supposed to become the experts to carry out this chart method and other advanced techniques of taking census of tigers to at least do the
survey in Meghalaya," Kumar added.

Project Tiger currently active in Meghalaya has said that there are only 47 tigers left in the state according to the census of 2002. This could well mean that the actual number of tigers left in the state in 2010 is significantly lower but officials are unsure on that head.

"We are still, you can say, gaping in the dark regarding the accuracy of the possible tiger population in the state, although we are confident, there are evidences science seen in the several corners of the state about the presence of tigers," said Kumar.

Tiger census of different states has shown an alarmingly sharp decrease in numbers, after which environmentalists and government organisations are under a lot of pressure.

Since January, the environmental group World Wildlife Fund (WWF) India, has spearheaded a public awareness campaign, led by the
Indiancricket and football captains, which has received close to 100,000 pledges of support on its website.
Poaching and loss of habitat have caused tiger numbers to plunge from around 40,000 at the turn of the 20th century in India.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Tigers not burning bright in India

New Delhi: How many tigers are actually left in India? If an advertisement featuring sport personalities like Mahendra Singh Dhoni and Baichung Bhutia is to be believed, India has 1,411 big cats. But the authorities in Delhi say the figure is exaggerated.

At a time when scientific data is increasingly found to be faulty, especially after the fiasco surrounding the vanishing of Himalayan glaciers, it seems the case is no different for tigers.

A day after Union environment and forest minister Jairam Ramesh admitted that India may not have 1,411 tigers, the Wildlife Institute of India (WII), which had carried out a survey, said that it too did not know how the authorities in Delhi reached the figure.

Ramesh had said on Tuesday that the figure of 1,411 was exaggerated. “We never gave the figure of 1,411 to anyone. We had only given an estimation of 1,100-1,600 after the survey. We don’t know how the ministry arrived at that figure. It is not part of our research. If the ministry wants to reject its figures on tiger population, that is not our problem. If someone in the ministry finds a midpoint of the estimates, we can’t do anything about it,” YV Jhala, faculty member of WII, who was part of the tiger census in India, said.

“It is glamourous to quote a figure while speaking in front of a gathering in Delhi, but the fact is that it is impossible to find out the tiger population in India. A tiger census doesn’t happen like that. We can only give estimates and not specific numbers,” Jhala added.

The confusion surrounding tiger numbers deepened after World Wildlife Fund (WWF) used the figure of 1,411 given by the national tiger conservation authority (NTCA) in an advertisement to boost public awareness on the diminishing number of tigers in India. The campaign, featuring Indian cricket team skipper Dhoni, is on air and is being promoted by a telecom company.

“The minister was only trying to say that tiger numbers have gone down since the last census. The figure of 1,411 is an average and it was calculated in 2006. It has been four years since then and now a fresh census is under way,” said Belinda Wright, an expert on tigers.

Since the last census figures came out in 2006, over 127 tigers have died in India. The worst was 2009, when 66 tigers died and the start of 2010 was also not good, with six deaths reported so far.

Gyan Varma / DNA Thursday, February 18, 2010 1:40 IST




Baby Leopard at a Doorstep [Please watch the video -click on the link]

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Strange-News/Baby-Leopard-Wanders-Into-Indian-Village/Article/201002215548926?lpos=Strange_News_First_Strange_News__Article_Teaser_Region__0&lid=ARTICLE_15548926_Baby_Leopard_Wanders_Into_Indian_Village

Stray Leopard Cub Becomes 'Star' In India

6:51pm UK, Sunday February 14, 2010

Heather Christie, Sky News Online

A leopard cub has become the talk of the town in northern India after appearing out of nowhere in the early morning and wandering onto a family's doorstep.

Nobody knows if the mother of the one-month-old cub abandoned her baby or whether she was killed or lost.

After receiving information that villagers had spotted a cub, Deputy Ranger of India's Forest Department Ram Gopal Chauhan arrived at the village of Bijnor.

"When we reached the site, we saw it was a leopard cub, one-month-old", he said

"To ensure his safety we took the cub to our station, where we fed it some milk. Then we took it for a medical check-up."

Ranger Chauhan and his team hope the cub will be reclaimed by its mother, if she is still alive.

India's leopards are increasingly threatened by poachers. Their habitat is also being depleted, forcing many to stray into human settlements.

They often attack people and cattle, and often get killed for it in return.

India's Wildlife Protection Society says that at least 228 leopards have been killed since January 2006, despite their endangered and protected status.


Whale Sharks - Gujarat - Space Technology

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/article109385.ece

Space technology to identify whale sharks off Gujarat

Indian scientists will try to distinguish individual whale sharks off the Gujarat coast, using a technique employed by NASA to identify galaxies.

Just as each tiger is distinguished by its stripes, whale sharks too can be identified through a unique pattern of spots that form points of numerous triangles on their bodies, say experts.

As the whale shark grows, the distance between these spots increases, but angles of these triangles remain the same, thus identifying the whale shark.

The method is also used by NASA to identify galaxies.

This initiative is part of a study to understand the migratory pattern, breeding and habitat of whale sharks for future conservation measures, says Dhiresh Joshi of the NGO Wildlife Trust of India (WTI) that is working on the project in partnership with the Gujarat forest department.

It involves taking underwater pictures of whale sharks and storing them in a global database managed by the NGO Ecocean.

If whale sharks spotted here are also sighted elsewhere in the world, it will help reveal their migratory path to the Arabian Sea through the oceans.

Initially, the forest department and WTI will be the main collaborators of the project. Later, fishermen will be roped in too, for sighting and the photo identification programme, says Joshi.

The project started last November, when Brad Norman, director of Ecocean Australia, trained forest staff on uploading photos on the online database and techniques of underwater photography.

Experts say horizontal shots of the spots around the fifth gill and pectoral fin on the left side of the fish are taken at an angle perpendicular to the fish. However, with the improvement on the software slightly angular pictures could also be corrected for identification.

The frame should show a bit of the water above and below the outline of the fish so as to get the orientation right.

Besides spot patterns captured in photographs of the fish, scarring and other markers were used in the past for identifications. Now by adapting a computer algorithm, an automated process has been developed originally used in astronomy for comparing star patterns in images of the night sky.

Each time a whale shark is photographed, details of the location, water conditions and other factors are recorded. The photographs help identify individual whale sharks, facilitate population estimation by the ‘mark recapture’ method and migratory pattern, he added.

Mr. Joshi says past record shows whale sharks aggregate in larger numbers off Gujarat than off any other state in India.

A survey by the NGO Traffic India recorded over 500 whale shark sightings between 1999 and 2000.

“The whale shark aggregation is less understood but from the satellite images it is clear there are large plankton blooms off the coast of Gujarat compared to any other maritime state and this could be the reason for such frequent sightings,” Mr. Joshi said.

“To date, Ecocean has identified 2,109 whale sharks worldwide, from 9,800 whale sharks sighted in 43 countries. Many identified sharks have been re—sighted on several occasions,” Mr. Norman said.

Ecocean has received support from the UN Environment Programme to promote the global whale shark library.

Corbett Controversies

Animal-man conflict on rise at India's Corbett Tiger park


Posted : Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:45:00 GMTBy : M G SrinathCategory : Nature (Environment)News Alerts by Email ( click here )Nature Environment News | HomeRead more: http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/308725,animal-man-conflict-on-rise-at-indias-corbett-tiger-park.html#ixzz0fz6yKxxO

New Delhi—Rampant commercialization, including unbridled tourism, and smudged lack of buffer zone between the forest area and surrounding human habitats has resulted in a conflict between the tigers and people living around the Corbett Tiger Reserve park in north India.

The Times of India newspaper reported Thursday that the animal-man conflict came into the open last week with two attacks, one of a woman being killed by a tiger and another of a leopard striking a group of three boys.

The incidents around Dhikuli led to a furious uprising of villagers who besieged forest officials demanding that the big cats be declared "adam khor'' or maneaters and be destroyed.

The Corbett reserve, billed as one of the success stories to preserve tigers, has a tiger population of 164 out India's 1,411 animals. India holds over half the world's tiger population, according to the National Tiger Conservation Authority.

The report says the area has become a conflict zone with a teeming tiger population and the high volume of tourists at so-called resorts that offer weekend parties and birthday bashes instead of wildlife viewing.

But in recent years, massive commercialisation has been posing an ecological and environmental threat and the attacks, which some say were waiting to happen, have highlighted the state government's failure to notify the park's buffer zone, as required under the Wildlife Protection Act.

The boys who had been attacked by a leopard, pointed out officials, were a good 1.25 km in the core area of the park while the tiger had killed its victim in the fringe area. The tiger appears to have been surprised as it had made a kill

Sources in National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) quoted by the newspaper said unbridled tourism was proving to be a bane for the park. "The number of tourist resorts has gone up manifold in the past few years, now numbering about 70, a majority of which are located between Ramnagar and the Dhangarhi gate.''

Corbett has been a haunt for tourists and wildlife lovers for a long time. In recent years the number of people coming here has increased dramatically. Presently, every season, from November 15 to June 15. more than 70,000 visitors come here from India and abroad. Corbett remains closed between June 16 and November 14, during the monsoon rains.

Corbett park director R K Mishra has been quoted as saying that a buffer zone is likely to be notified in the coming week.

The buffer zone would give the park management more teeth to make rules for the adjoining areas.

The Corbett National Park lies in the Nainital, Pauri Garwhal and Bijnore districts of Uttaranchal state. The present area of the Reserve is 1318.54 sq. km. including 520 sq. km. of core area and 797.72 sq. km. of buffer area. The core area forms the Jim Corbett National Park while the buffer contains reserve forests (496.54 sq.km.) as well as the Sonanadi Wildlife Sanctuary (301.18 sq.km.)

The core is bounded to the North by the Kanda Ridge, with a height of 1043 m at its highest point. The entire area of the reserve is mountainous and falls in the Shivalik and Outer Himalaya geological region. It forms the catchment area of the Ramganga, a tributary of River Ganges.

The park is named after Edward James "Jim" Corbett (1875-1955) a British hunter, conservationist and naturalist, famous for slaying a large number of man-eating tigers and leopards in India.

Corbett held the rank of colonel in the British colonial Indian Army and worked for the Bengal and North Western Railway. However, Corbett was frequently called upon by the then colonial government to slay man-eating tigers and leopards who had killed people in the villages of the Garhwal and Kumaon region.

Corbett between 1907 and 1938 shot much-feared man-eaters such as the Champawat Tiger, the Leopard of Rudraprayag, the Tigers of Chowgarh and the Panar Leopard, who had cumulatively killed over a thousand people. His success in slaying the man-eaters earned him much respect and fame amongst the people residing in the villages of Kumaon, many of whom considered him a sadhu (saint).

Corbett was an avid photographer and after his retirement, authored the Man-Eaters of Kumaon, Jungle Lore and other books recounting his hunts and experiences, which enjoyed much critical acclaim and commercial success. Corbett later spoke out for the need to protect India's wildlife from extermination.